Additional Information
View the Recording Templates for this Activity (Microsoft Word, 33 KB)
Guidelines for marking
The following guidelines for marking show one approach to assigning a value to a student's work. Other approaches may be used that better suit the reporting process of the school. Categories, marks, grades, visual representations or individual comments/notations may all be useful.
| Range | A student in this range: |
|
8-10
(High) |
|
| 4-7 (Satisfactory) |
|
| 1-3 (Progressing) |
|
Feedback
Brief written annotations on the student report where necessary, commenting on:
- selection of appropriate file types and media
- identification of relevant legal and ethical issues
- justification of the selection of file types and media.
Oral feedback to the students during the Activity. Comments will inform students about such things as:
- suitability of media depending on its planned use
- depth of discussion and number of issues considered for the scenario.
Future directions
Through this Activity students are developing an ability to critically evaluate and justify their decisions in terms of relevant legal and ethical issues. They are developing a better understanding of database systems in context, which they will use later in the unit when they are required to develop their own database software solutions. They will be required to carry out similar activities for all other modules covered in the course.
Resources
- Teacher-developed briefing sheet outlining the details of the particular scenario.
- Teacher-developed feedback grid sheet, to be submitted with their report.
-
Internet sites:
- NSD (Norwegian Social Science Data Services) Homepage
www.nsd.uib.no/English/privacy - Loughborough University Data Collection and Storage
www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/committees/ethical/gn/deas.htm - Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2000
www.jmir.org/2000/1/e8
- NSD (Norwegian Social Science Data Services) Homepage