Additional Information
Guidelines for marking
The following guidelines for marking show one approach to assigning a value to a student’s work. Other approaches may be used that better suit the reporting process of the school. Categories, marks, grades, visual representations or individual comments/notations may all be useful.
Range |
|
---|---|
High |
|
Satisfactory |
|
Progressing |
|
Feedback
The teacher will provide ongoing oral feedback to students in the planning phase of the Activity and written feedback at the completion of the digital work. This oral and written feedback will provide students with ways to refine their works and will inform them about such things as:
- their use of software programs, and technologies such as the scanner and digital camera to manipulate and integrate images
- their organisation of visual qualities and images in an interesting composition referencing portraiture conventions and postmodern conventions of wit, irony, parody and appropriation to communicate a new meaning for an audience
- their introduction of aspects of the school environment and the student’s own world into the work to communicate a point of view.
Peer assessment may take the form of students interpreting and finding new meanings in the digitally manipulated and appropriated artworks.
Future directions
As a result of this Activity students have developed an understanding of the postmodern frame and the application of information and computer technologies (ICT) in making artworks. This learning can be further developed through individual and group work activities where students make a video, multi-media presentation, or animation based on the altered artwork. Students may also use the digital artwork as the basis for a sculpture or installation work or for application to a series of designed objects. Students can investigate the original artist and artwork, compare their intentions and record these findings in their Visual Arts diary.